![]() Functions and structure of a medical school. Peer review improves the quality of MCQ examinations. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions. Improving assessment quality in professional higher education: could external peer review of items be the answer? Cogent Med. Smeby SS, Lillebo B, Gynnild V, Samstad E, Standal R, Knobel H, Vik A, Slordahl TS. Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations. ![]() Wallach PM, Crespo LM, Holtzman KZ, Galbraith RM, Swanson DB. Barriers and facilitators to writing quality items for medical school assessments–a scoping review. Assessment in health professions education. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations. Identification of technical item flaws leads to improvement of the quality of single best multiple choice questions. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology. The quality of in-house medical school examinations. Jozefowicz RF, Koeppen BM, Case S, Galbraith R, Swanson D, Glew RH. How-to-guide for writing multiple choice questions for the pharmacy instructor. A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Building an exam through rigorous exam quality improvement. Zaidi NLB, Monrad SU, Grob KL, Gruppen LD, Cherry-Bukowiec JR, Santen SA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |